<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Eric Schultz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ericszulc.com/wordpress/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ericszulc.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Work &#038; Thoughts on Economics &#038; Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing for the (dis)Organization by timzski</title>
		<link>http://www.ericszulc.com/wordpress/2006/06/22/designing-for-the-disorganization/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>timzski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericszulc.com/wordpress/2006/06/22/designing-for-the-disorganization/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Those are some deep thoughts. If you ever figure out an answer to &quot;How can we design information/tools to reveal disorganization that is actually healthy and produces alternative perceptions and innovation?&quot;, I would be interested in hearing. I think it would be hard to get people to think that disorganization is healthy. It is kind of the same thing with failure. It has been said that to be a success, you must fail your way there. It took Thomas Edison over 1000 failures in order to be a success and create a working light bulb. Problem is that people today are taught to avoid failure, but it is necessary for success. I wonder if disorganization can be applied in the same manner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are some deep thoughts. If you ever figure out an answer to &#8220;How can we design information/tools to reveal disorganization that is actually healthy and produces alternative perceptions and innovation?&#8221;, I would be interested in hearing. I think it would be hard to get people to think that disorganization is healthy. It is kind of the same thing with failure. It has been said that to be a success, you must fail your way there. It took Thomas Edison over 1000 failures in order to be a success and create a working light bulb. Problem is that people today are taught to avoid failure, but it is necessary for success. I wonder if disorganization can be applied in the same manner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

